The straightforward plan of the Rolex Oyster wristband mixes consummately with the utilitarian lines of the Submariner and the GMT-Master. On the wrist, it wears incredible, and the misleadingly basic catch works faultlessly. Notwithstanding, it would be an error to call the advanced Oyster arm band as far as we might be concerned today a solitary brilliant idea. Its creation was more a ceaseless interaction of gradual enhancements; Rolex calmly ensured that the Oyster arm band kept on being the most practical around, with practically imperceptible final details consistently. Accordingly, the arm bands alone offer knowledge into Rolex’s way of life, particularly its fixation on the subtleties that matter. As far as I might be concerned, the clique status appreciated by vintage and current Rolex the same can be followed through the development of these apparently straightforward parts.
Vintage advertisement for Gay Frères, including an arm band that looks a horrendous part like the Oyster.
The history of the Oyster arm band doesn’t need incongruity, since the primary wristbands were truth be told neither made by Rolex nor offered as a standard choice in Rolex lists. In the mid 1930s, arm bands were surely an exorbitant extra, addressing here and there practically a large portion of the cost of the independent watch (on account of a two-tone Rolex Imperial). The first Rolex arm bands were made by the most famous wristband provider around, Gay Frères, better know for later making the arm band of the first Audemars Piguet Royal Oak just as the weird empty connection arm band of the Zenith El Primero. The Bonklip (additionally nicknamed the “Bamboo”) was the most common shape at that point, with the restricted equal connections you can see on the actual left of the family picture below.
Interestingly, numerous providers made a similar kind of wristband at that point, however Rolex stayed dedicated to Gay Frères through the 1930s and 1940s. In a delightful wind, the productive wristband creator that had provided Rolex in any case was really obtained by Rolex in 1998, underlining the company’s consistent mission of getting its providers to continually streamline the creation interaction. This mechanical methodology bodes well when you arrive at the creation volume of Rolex – and, not a little detail, when you likewise have as enormous a money reserve.
A timetable of Oyster wristbands, from the pre-Oysters at left to the cutting edge strong connections at right.
Looking at a similar photograph, you can likewise see the wristband that would fill in as just about a delicate prologue to the Oyster. Following on from the Bonklip, you can see an irregular arm band with twofold focus joins, however a large part of a similar look as the Oyster.
But those were only the forerunners of the Oyster arm band, which was protected in February 1947 (patent number 257,185, on the off chance that you were pondering) and first showed up in a Rolex index in 1948. Nonetheless, it was not the first in-house arm band from Rolex – the Jubilee holds this honor, as it was matched with the new Datejust at the dispatch of this notable line in 1945.
At first, the Oyster arm band was for the most part expected for purported “bubble backs” and chronographs, while ties stayed the significantly more common alternative across Rolex’s portfolio. The plan and development of the Oyster wristband was left basically unaltered for the decade and a half after its presenting, however an earth shattering expansion was presented in 1952. Up until this date, the Oyster wristband just accompanied straight closures, yet at long last patent number 303,005 revived the vaunted end joins, which completed the Rolex look as far as we might be concerned today.
The end joins permit the Oyster to consummately incorporate into the instance of the specific watch.
One can see the end connect as the missing “interface” in the picture of the complete watch, at long last shutting the hole between the arm band and the case, and considering a slick reconciliation between the two components. It additionally serves a reasonable capacity (as you’d anticipate from Rolex), diminishing the tension on the spring bars’ edges, as it hold those parts set up and circulates any strain all the more equitably. Obviously, the principal model to be production line fitted with end joins was the Rolex GMT-Master reference 6542, dispatched in 1954. This decision underlines the energetic nature of the Oyster wristband, which soon prepared the Explorer and the Submariner as well. It stayed the lone choice accessible for Rolex sport looks for the following 10 years, until the Jubilee got offered with the refreshed Rolex GMT-Master, the reference 1675.
Three ages of Oyster wristbands, with the bolt on top, the collapsed connect the center, and the strong connection on the bottom.
From the mid 1950s on, the Oyster has constantly gone through huge changes, most prominently acquiring mass to build its opposition, albeit the essential usefulness has remained consistent with the first idea.
The original is commonly called the “bolt wristband,” due to the noticeable bolts on the external edge that hold together the empty, collapsed joins. Next we get the “collapsed interface arm band,” which shows the heftier connections, which are made by collapsing a piece of metal on itself on different occasions. For those wristbands, the pins are inward and not obvious on the external edge. The last shape is clearly the thickest, with genuinely strong connections. This is the arrangement you find on current Rolex watches nowadays.
The bolted joins are extensively slimmer yet in addition substantially more delicate than the cutting edge strong links.
Functionality was continually lord here – the progressions were not made for corrective reasons – and the more compact the wristband interfaces, the better it can support maltreatment after some time. One should not fail to remember that a wristband that breaks can bring about a lost or broken watch. It truly shows how basic the opposition of the wristband is for the simple endurance of a watch, something Rolex has been resolute about. As an aside, it’s this mentality that discloses why Rolex will in general supplant parts to “overhaul” your Rolex with the most recent element accessible when you take it in for administration (a lot to the surrender all expectations regarding vintage aficionados, for whom complete inventiveness is the aim).
Each arm band type comes with explicit end joins, coordinating the profile of the case that they would be connected to.
Looking at any Rolex wristband of any age uncovers how Rolex utilizes its fixation on subtleties to help it increase to a particularly enormous creation volumes (at the present time gauges place the quantity of watches delivered every year somewhere near 1,000,000). Nothing remains to risk, and therefore every age of Oyster wristband accompanied a particular reference number, frequently found on the last connection of the arm band, showing the age that it has a place with as well as the size of the end interfaces that it takes. For example, the reference 7206 is right for a bolted Oyster with 20mm end joins, while exactly the same arm band with 19mm end connections would be assigned as a kind of perspective 7205 (and we should not fail to remember the women’s reference 7204 with 13mm end links).
The catch regularly bears the area and date of the arm band’s production.
To make matters much more complicated, some little varieties existed in each model, regularly because of a nearby creation – to cover less in expenses, numerous arm bands were delivered in the USA or Mexico, separately bearing “C&I” and “Hecho en Mexico” on the fasten. The underlying bolt arm band additionally offered two sorts of development, one extending joins (remarkably the references 6634/6635/6636, again to represent a distinction between end connect sizes). Those immediately demonstrated less strong than the standard fixed-interface wristbands as were eliminated (also the brilliant depilatory properties of the former).
The extending joins were an extraordinary thought on paper, however they demonstrated substantially more delicate on the wrist.
The new age with collapsed joins shows up in the last part of the 1960s and bears the references 7834/7835/7836 (and 9315 for the Rolex Submariner, yet more on that variation later), the end joins themselves advancing to fit the new arm band and the new cases better. Once more, this particular part bears its own reference number, which permits somebody to ensure the combination of arm band and end joins works appropriately with a given watch. The careful collapsing demonstrated more grounded than the first bolt development however was ultimately supplanted with the full, strong connections. The new arm bands essentially took a similar reference numbers as their collapsed connect archetypes, however with the option of an extra zero toward the finish of each (78360 for the 20mm Oyster wristband, etc). The strong connection development is the structure factor we know today, either offered with a complete brushed look or with cleaned focus joins on account of the Daytona and the GMT-Master II.
Obviously, the Oyster wristband has been duplicated ordinarily, and to be reasonable its plan couldn’t be totally ascribed to Rolex. Yet, for as long as 70 years it has stayed the benchmark against which all other sports watch arm band is judged. It tends to be contended that a few plans demonstrated more refined – the interesting arm band of the Royal Oak comes to mind – yet it is elusive a superior capacity driven apparatus watch wristband anyplace. That is to say, if it’s sufficient for 007…
The Rolex GMT Master-II, with its purported Pepsi bezel and an Oyster wristband with the improved clasp.
It would be unjustifiable to stop our drill-down at the connection level, since Rolex didn’t restrict its concentration to simply the opposition of the connections, anyway significant that component was. Close by the advancements depicted over, the end joins themselves likewise got thicker. Eventually, we even wound up with full, strong end interfaces as opposed to the collapsed ones from the previous wristbands. This move really began the heavier Rolex Sea-Dweller, the Submariner’s significantly harder cousin. Presently the strong end joins come standard on all Rolex wristbands, made both in valuable metals and in steel, taking into account the spring bar to be far better kept up in the pivot of the haul openings. Like we didn’t utter a word, is managed without a genuine purpose.
The fasten is clearly endorsed with a couple of Rolex logos.
Another critical advancement relates to the catches. While the collapsing of two bended edges and a covering catch demonstrated however proficient as it seemed to be straightforward, this system was nonetheless powerless to undesirable openings when a solid stun was applied. Clearly this is not exactly ideal on an apparatus watch, which is by its tendency intended to encounter mileage in extreme conditions (recall the jump watches commissioned for Comex and the British Army ). So the Submariner and Sea-Dweller were given their own fasten plan in 1969, with an extra getting clasp over the essential collapsing component, which likewise shrouds an implicit jumper’s augmentation framework . As you could gather, this change created its own line of Oyster arm bands, the reference 9315/9316 being what might be compared to a 7836 wristband for a Submariner outfitted with a more grounded fasten (later supplanted by the 93150 with full connections). Note that current fasten now likewise offers an extra miniature change framework (called the “glidelock”), as you would discover in the advanced wristband 93250 committed to the Submariner.
The Tudor Submariner advantages from similar favorable circumstances as its Rolex cousins, getting a certified Oyster bracelet.
Far from being an arbitrary one-shot item improvement, the consistent dedication put into the Oyster arm band over many years truly accentuates Rolex’s attention on doing an amazing job with every last specialized spec that can improve its watches. One can contend that this advancement now and again comes to the detriment of the enchanting little characteristics that make us love the vintage models, however the outcome isn’t questionable and the watches improve instrument watches, perpetually.
You can perceive how the essential shape and feel of the Oyster continued as before more than three ages, notwithstanding totally different constructions.
Looking behind the sheer torrential slide of references appeared in the outline beneath, these arm bands uncover a disparaged side of Rolex: the extraordinary minutia of its item plan. The accentuation put on usefulness gradually molded and reshaped the look and feels of the wristbands and watches since the 1950s, and furthermore clarifies why the cutting edge cycles feel so associated with the first pieces.
A Full Breakdown Of Vintage Oyster Bracelets By Reference
Note: Thanks to the vendor Sheartime for giving those delightful vintage bracelets.